All plays

Play 53 · Software, web and AI

ForMobile QA agenciesToThe mobile lead

Your reviews say the app crashes since the update

A six-step play for a mobile QA agency. It starts from App Store, stacks Google Play on top, and ends in a message to the mobile lead that is useful before anyone replies.

Installs this workflow, five project tables and a draft campaign. Source access and any external outputs are checked before research.

Category
Software, web and AI
Sources
2
Steps
6

The workflow

  1. TriggerApp StoreReviews, ratings and release dates
  2. Evidence
  3. Artifact
    What you hand overA crash pattern report: affected devices and versions from reviews, the rating trend, and a reproduction attempt.
  4. Contact
    GliderFinds the mobile lead, with a verified work email and a phone
  5. Message
    Send itFrom your own mailboxes, evidence attached

Why it earns attention

When an update makes an app crash, reviews say so before the team's dashboards are clear. A pattern by device and version, plus a reproduction, is a head start on the fix.

The play in six steps

  1. 01

    Find the crash reviews

    App Store
    What you pull
    Reviews since the latest release: rating, text mentioning crashes or freezes, device and OS where given, and the rating trend.
    Why it matters
    A sudden cluster after a release points at that release. The rating drop puts a cost on it.
    Example

    38 reviews mention crashes on launch since version 5.2 · rating 4.6 to 3.9

  2. 02

    Check Android

    Google Play
    What you pull
    The same for the Android app.
    Why it matters
    If Android is clean, the bug is in the iOS code. That narrows the search.
    Example

    No crash spike on Android

  3. 03

    Build the crash report

    Your artifact
    What you build
    The pattern by device and OS version, quotes from reviews, and the result of trying to reproduce it on one device.
    Why it works
    The mobile lead gets a head start, not a sales deck.
    Example

    Mostly older iPhones on the latest iOS · reproduced on one device at launch

  4. 04

    Check before you send

    Reviews are noisy. Report what users say, not a diagnosis, and only claim a reproduction you actually got.

  5. 05

    Find the mobile lead in Glider

    Glider
    Search for
    Head of mobileMobile engineering leadQA leadProduct manager
    Why them
    The mobile lead owns the crash and the rating. QA wants to know why tests missed it.
    What you get
    A work email and a direct phone, with the email verified before it goes into a sequence.
  6. 06

    Send the evidence, then run the first test

    • Facts from the data (the number is the step)
    • What you built for them
    • One small ask
    Why it works
    It brings evidence the team can use today, about a problem that is costing them ratings right now.
    First test
    Twenty apps with a review spike after a platform release.
    Success looks like
    Three replies out of ten apps, and one QA engagement.

The sample message is hypothetical and its numbers are illustrative. Verify every claim, date and rule before sending.

Sources used

The two sources this play names. Each links to the other plays that use it.

All 63 GTM plays

Run this play with Glider.

Deploy the full workflow into a project. Conway checks your scope and source access, builds the evidence, and prepares outreach for review.