Play 53 · Software, web and AI
Your reviews say the app crashes since the update
A six-step play for a mobile QA agency. It starts from App Store, stacks Google Play on top, and ends in a message to the mobile lead that is useful before anyone replies.
Installs this workflow, five project tables and a draft campaign. Source access and any external outputs are checked before research.
- Category
- Software, web and AI
- Sources
- 2
- Steps
- 6
The workflow
- Trigger
App StoreReviews, ratings and release dates - Evidence
- ArtifactWhat you hand overA crash pattern report: affected devices and versions from reviews, the rating trend, and a reproduction attempt.
- ContactGliderFinds the mobile lead, with a verified work email and a phone
- MessageSend itFrom your own mailboxes, evidence attached
Why it earns attention
When an update makes an app crash, reviews say so before the team's dashboards are clear. A pattern by device and version, plus a reproduction, is a head start on the fix.
The play in six steps
- 01
Find the crash reviews
App Store- What you pull
- Reviews since the latest release: rating, text mentioning crashes or freezes, device and OS where given, and the rating trend.
- Why it matters
- A sudden cluster after a release points at that release. The rating drop puts a cost on it.
Example38 reviews mention crashes on launch since version 5.2 · rating 4.6 to 3.9
- 02
Check Android
Google Play- What you pull
- The same for the Android app.
- Why it matters
- If Android is clean, the bug is in the iOS code. That narrows the search.
ExampleNo crash spike on Android
- 03
Build the crash report
Your artifact- What you build
- The pattern by device and OS version, quotes from reviews, and the result of trying to reproduce it on one device.
- Why it works
- The mobile lead gets a head start, not a sales deck.
ExampleMostly older iPhones on the latest iOS · reproduced on one device at launch
- 04
Check before you send
Reviews are noisy. Report what users say, not a diagnosis, and only claim a reproduction you actually got.
- 05
Find the mobile lead in Glider
Glider- Search for
- Head of mobileMobile engineering leadQA leadProduct manager
- Why them
- The mobile lead owns the crash and the rating. QA wants to know why tests missed it.
- What you get
- A work email and a direct phone, with the email verified before it goes into a sequence.
- 06
Send the evidence, then run the first test
To: the mobile leadEvery line comes from a step above Since version 5.2, 38 of your App Store reviews mention crashes on launch, and your rating fell from 4.6 to 3.9.1 Android looks clean, so it seems specific to iOS.2 I mapped the pattern by device and OS, and reproduced it on an older iPhone.3 Want the report?
- Facts from the data (the number is the step)
- What you built for them
- One small ask
- Why it works
- It brings evidence the team can use today, about a problem that is costing them ratings right now.
- First test
- Twenty apps with a review spike after a platform release.
- Success looks like
- Three replies out of ten apps, and one QA engagement.
The sample message is hypothetical and its numbers are illustrative. Verify every claim, date and rule before sending.
Sources used
The two sources this play names. Each links to the other plays that use it.
Related plays
All 63 GTM playsRun this play with Glider.
Deploy the full workflow into a project. Conway checks your scope and source access, builds the evidence, and prepares outreach for review.